The answer is no. To be fair, aside from the click bait, the article itself does not make any such claim. It covers a new study on some igneous rocks from Arunachal Pradesh that formed during an earlier pre-Himalaya stage of the India Asia plate convergence.
By mid late Cretaceous times, between 100 to 66 million years ago, the dense ocean lithosphere that was the front edge of the Indian plate was sinking underneath the Ladakh terrain, a splinter of Asian continental plate disconnected from the mainland. The subduction of the Indian plate triggered extensive melting in the deep subsurface, building over time a magmatic arc. The schematic below shows the plate tectonic scenario.
This arc has been well studied in the Kohistan and Ladakh areas. The new work found that a body of granitic rock known as the Lohit pluton is also an eastern extension of the Kohistan Ladakh arc complex.
Eventually, the oceanic crust of the Indian plate was consumed and the Indian continental crust collided with the Ladakh terrain, which by this time had sutured with the Asian mainland. Himalayan mountain building begins from this point on, roughly sometime after 50 million years ago.
How do geologists know when topography began to form in the Himalayan region? Various dating methods tell us when a particular rock or mineral crystallized or cooled below a particular temperature. But how do we date the formation of topography? Sedimentary geology, my field of specialization, has played a big role in giving us insights into the tectonic and topographic evolution of the Himalaya. I'll summarize how the story of the formation of the different Himalaya ranges came to be written by these geologists.
Due to inherited geologic history and subsequent conditions during continental collision, the entire region between Ladakh and the Himalaya front can be subdivided into six geologic terrains running along the length of the mountain arc. These are, from north to south, the Gangdese magmatic arc, the Indus-Tsangpo suture zone, the Tethys Himalaya, the Greater Himalaya, the Lesser Himalaya, and the sub Himalaya (Siwalik). Each is made up of distinctive rock associations.
The earliest topography began to from in the north, at the zone of contact between the two continental plates. Over time, there was a step wise progression of southwards topography formation. As each of the geologic terrains rose up, newly developed stream networks started eroding the rocks and delivered distinctive sediment mixtures to two types of sedimentary basins which had developed adjacent to the mountains. The Indus and Bengal basins at the two extremities of the Himalaya received sediments from the Indus and the Yarlung-Tsangpo/Brahmaputra. A second type of basin, known as a foreland basin formed to the south of the orogen. This moat like depression which runs parallel to the Himalaya, and is fed by streams running transverse to the ranges, also became an archive of material removed from the mountains.
By carefully identifying the sedimentary grain types deposited in these basins and how their proportions change through the oldest to the youngest layers, geologists have been able to piece together the evolution of new topography and geologic provenance through time.
I am presenting this reconstruction through a series of time slices which show topography formation in each of the geologic terrains and the resulting stream networks transporting the derived sediment from source to sink. The representation only shows the central foreland basin from Himachal Pradesh to Nepal. I have not shown the sedimentary history of the western and eastern basins. The trends at the Himalaya extremities are similar with some difference due to variations in the dominant geology of the contributing catchments.
I have also not covered a short phase of basin formation in the Indus Tsangpo suture zone between 30 to 20 million years ago. This basin received sediments from both the Gangdese Arc and the Indian plate and was then uplifted to form the Indus Group ranges which include the famous Kailash mountain. For more details of this episode of Himalaya mountain building do refer to my post - Is Mount Kailash the Oldest Mountain in the Himalaya?
In the diagrams, the legend "foreland sandstone diagnostic grains" refers to the arrival of a suite of distinct grain types in the foreland basin. This signals the uplift and erosion of new rock types in the growing mountain range. Earlier formed ranges will in most cases continue to contribute sand, but it is the first appearance of a new grain type in successive strata that is the indicator of tectonic and topographic changes.
The inspiration for these diagrams is from P.G. DeCelles and coworkers paper on the timing of the India Asia collision, published in the May 2014 issue of Tectonics.
A) Initial Continental Collision- 58-54 million years ago: What was the timing of the collision?
 |
B) Proto Himalaya Stage- 45-30 million years ago.
Preceding and during collision, slices of the Indian oceanic plate were thrust up and sandwiched between the two continental plates. Igneous rocks of this "suture zone" are made up of magnesium rich silicate minerals (olivine, pyroxene) and magnesium aluminum oxides (spinel). Only a remnant arm of the Tethys persists, but rivers can now flow across the Indian continent and deliver sediments to the foreland basin. This basin is located roughly over what is now the southern Lesser Himalaya and the Siwalik ranges. Gangdese Arc and suture zone derived sediments first appear in the foreland by 45 million years ago.
C) Early Himalaya Stage- 35-20 million years ago.
A pulse of low grade metamorphic rock fragments start appearing in the early Oligocene to Miocene age foreland basin sediments. These are derived from the newly forming Tethyan fold and thrust belt. Volcanic rock fragments are now absent in the central foreland, suggesting that the growing Tethyan ranges are a barrier to rivers originating in the Gangdese Arc. The Indus and the Yarlung Tsangpo, initiated in the furrow of the suture zone and flowing parallel to the northern ranges before cutting across the rising mountain chain, continue to transport arc derived sediment to the basins at the western and eastern extremities.
D) Main Himalaya Stage- From 20 million years ago.
Three pulses of mountain building are recognized during the Main Himalaya Stage. The early phase from 20 -11 million years ago records the uplift of the Greater Himalaya which are made up of high grade metamorphic rocks containing minerals like mica, feldspar, and garnet. Deformation continued southwards between 11-5 million years ago resulting in the formation of the Lesser Himalaya ranges. These shed low grade metamorphic and dolostone (magnesium calcium carbonate) detritus.
Eventually the foreland basin got caught up in the progressing orogeny. New faults propagated southwards. Slices of the oldest foreland basin deposits were broken and accreted to the mountain front. These freshly exhumed rocks became the major source of sediments feeding the youngest depositional phase in the foreland. Pliocene-Pleistocene (5 -0.5 million years ago) layers of the Siwalik hills are made up of rock fragments cannibalized from Eocene and Oligocene foreland strata.
How is the age of the foreland basin sediments determined? The entire exercise of unraveling the topographic history of the Himalaya depends on that!
These sediments have been dated using a variety of methods. Fossils provide age ranges for packages of sediment. Magnetic signals preserved in iron rich mineral grains are measured and pegged to an absolute date by comparing the magnetic pattern to a global magnetic chronology. Techniques such as fission track dating of zirconium silicate sand (zircon) tells geologists when that zircon in its source was being uplifted and cooled thus giving a fair idea of the time of its erosion, transport, and deposition as a sedimentary particle.
Gathering all this age information on the sediments, the timing of the arrival of distinctive rock fragments and minerals in the foreland agrees well with the exhumation history of their provenance as deduced from bedrock geochronology.
The growth of mountain chains is a long and complex process. The word "collision" may invoke ideas of near instant crustal response, but deformation and surface uplift moves rather slowly across strong and rigid plates. Surface and deep crustal process are linked. For example, the formation of the Tethyan fold and thrust belt resulted in crustal thickening and the deep burial and metamorphism of rocks that eventually became the Greater Himalaya. There was a long time lag between the initiation of collision and the main Himalaya pulse of uplift. The rise of the Greater Himalaya took place a good 35 million years after the India Asia impact.
Foreland basins give us valuable insights into the relationship between sedimentation and tectonics, but they too need careful evaluation. They are not static entities. Compare the proto Himalaya stage with the main Himalaya stage and you will notice that as mountain building moved southwards the location of the foreland shifted too in response to the migrating load of the thickened crust. This process continues to this day. If the region of the Siwalik hills was the foreland a few million years ago, today it is the Ganga alluvial plains.
Orogeny and drainage impact the sedimentation patterns in the foreland. Different rivers breaking through along the mountain front may not be bringing uniform sediment mixtures at the same time. Hinterland differences in geology of the catchment results in variable sand composition along the length of the foreland. Take the example of river Ravi. It drains mostly the Lesser Himalaya and hence its brings with it low grade metamorphic sand grains. On the other hand, the Sutlej flows through a significant portion of the Greater Himalaya. High grade metamorphic grains make up a large proportion of its sand.
Further, chemical reactions taking place in the subsurface may dissolve some types of minerals. This may create an apparent trend in sand composition through time, which may not accurately reflect the actual history of the provenance.
Researchers need to be cognizant of these issues when they construct their answers.
Understanding the timing of Himalaya uplift provides valuable insights
into the geodynamic forces at play during continental collisions. But
the interest in this question goes beyond geology. Climate scientists
want to know more about the linkage between Himalaya evolution and the
advent and shifts in the Asian monsoon. And the value of studying the Himalaya spills into many other areas. Orogeny exposed enormous volumes
of fresh rock to chemical weathering, mobilizing nutrients and organic
carbon which would then be sequestered in fluvial and marine environments. These elemental cycling and budgets are keenly studied by surface
systems specialists.
Visit the picturesque Kangra region in Himachal Pradesh. Climb the thick sandstone layers leading up to the historic Kangra fort. Go to nearby Jwalamukhi, where natural gas emanating from the deep keeps alight an eternal flame. Ascend the hills towards the famous town of Dharamshala. You will be traveling through the Miocene foreland basin. Sedimentary petrologists for decades have worked on these and other sites along the Himalaya frontal ranges amassing data on sandstone composition. Even as million dollar instrumentation keep revealing new facets of the earth, their main tool has remained the humble petrologic microscope mounted with a grain counting stage. From this labor of love has emerged the story of how and when the Himalaya came to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment