Across The Eparchean Unconformity

An unconformity is a gap in the recording of earth's history, similar to missing pages in a book. These breaks are more common than is realized. Stratigraphers, who organize geologic history, estimate that the time spans of non deposition exceed that of episodes of deposition. These gaps could be fleeting, as in a river meandering away and then reoccupying the old channel, or they could indicate conditions of non deposition and erosion lasting tens to even hundreds of millions of years.

Geologists recognize a hierarchy with the longer lasting breaks often pointing to major changes such as a mountain building phase accompanied by a prolonged sea level fall. As sediment deposition stops, erosion will often sculpt the top of the rock formation into an uneven surface. Eventually sediment deposition will resume. Geologists term such a break between the two phases of rock formation as an erosional unconformity.

Recently, the Geological Survey of India added the Eparchean Unconformity to its growing list of Geo-Heritage sites of national importance. This is one of those major long lasting erosional breaks seen in the Precambrian terrains of India. The chosen site is near Kalinjar Fort, in Banda District of Uttar Pradesh. Image Source: Geological Survey of India.

At this location, 1.2 billion year old sandstone of the Vindhyan Basin overlie 2.5 billion year old Bundelkhand granites marking more than a billion years of non deposition and erosion. While the amount of unrecorded time is significant, the real importance of this site is in the very different earth conditions represented by the older Bundelkhand granite as compared to the much younger Vindhyan sandstone. This unconformity marks the transition between the older Archean Eon and the younger Proterozoic Eon.

The Archean was a much hotter world. Melting of the earth’s mantle was producing large batches of silica rich magma which solidified to form buoyant continental crust, small rafts at first, growing into larger blocks as time went by. Vertical crustal movements created narrow depressions which got filled with lava and sediment eroded from nearby granitic highlands. These volcano-sedimentary successions were deformed and metamorphosed, and were preserved as enclaves within the granitic terrains.

By around 2.5 billion years ago, magmatic growth of continents petered out. Geologists estimate that around 70% of the present volume of continental crust was generated between 4 billion to 2.5 billion years ago.

As the mantle cooled, the more stable continental crust became the floor for a younger generation of sedimentary basins. The processes of chemical weathering and sediment transport became more prolonged on this wide gently subsiding continental terrain. As a result, waves and currents had more time to sort sediment by size, shape, and density before it was buried.

Thick deposits sorted by size into gravel, sand, and mud are the typical features of these younger basins. At places, ocean water saturated with calcium carbonate precipitated layers of calcite and aragonite sediment, preserved today as thick limestone. The biosphere was dominated by bacteria and unicellular eukaryotes, their morphology often imprinted on the rocks as wavy layers or as small mound shaped objects.

Magmatism and continental crustal growth continued less frequently in pulses coinciding with regions of plate convergence and orogeny. This phase, before large animal life evolved, lasting between 2.5 billion years and 539 million years ago is known as the Proterozoic Eon.

The newly listed National Geological Monument at Kalinjar Fort showcases these changing earth conditions.

For many decades though, exactly where to place the Eparchean Unconformity was something of a problem in Indian field geology. There was only sparse information on the absolute age of rocks and no consensus on the time span the Archean represented. Field mapping through Peninsular India indicated the presence of a distinct erosional break between deformed and metamorphosed rocks (crystalline basement) and younger flat lying or less deformed sediments. This appeared to be the natural horizon between the Archean and the Proterozoic.

But flat lying sedimentary sequences in different Indian basins, often referred to as Purana Basins, had been deposited at different times on older deformed rocks of varying ages. In some cases the foundation of the sub-horizontal sedimentary basins was indeed Archean. In other locations, the highly metamorphosed and deformed older rocks were actually Proterozoic. That meant that the Eparchean Unconformity, as earlier conceived, was not a useful marker of synchronous changes in earth processes. Many of these doubts are summarized early in this 1968 perspective on the Eparchean Unconformity by Dr. T V V G R K. Murthy, faculty at University of Sagar.

The dates for the Archean-Proterozoic transition have now been fixed at 2500 million years by the International Subcommisson of Precambrian Stratigraphy, without any condition regarding the rock type above and below the unconformity surface. As a result, the older criteria for identifying a particular erosional break as the Eparchean interval based on only rock types and extent of deformation was no longer tenable.

We finally have an answer for the question posed by Dr. Murthy so long ago:

“Does the eparchaean unconformity become evident by recognizing Archaean and Purana formations or are the Archaean and Puranas recognized by identifying the eparchaean unconformity”.

Today, better absolute dating of rocks makes differentiating Archean from Proterozoic rocks easier. The Eparchean Unconformity though is still an informal but useful term in Indian field geology signifying the cooling trajectory of the earth’s interior, with a hotter Archean transitioning to a cooler Proterozoic.

One of my earliest encounters with the Eparchean Unconformity occurred during my graduate studies. I was assigned to map an area of the Cuddapah Basin near Gani village in Andhra Pradesh, South India. I first traveled by the Dadar -Madras (now Chennai) Express to Guntakal. There, I transferred to a medium gauge train passing through small market towns connecting a vast hinterland an urban kid like me was unfamiliar with. The train chugged along eastwards towards Nandyal. For a couple of hours from Guntakal, we were firmly on Archean terrain, an agricultural landscape interrupted by small hillocks of granitic rocks. In a distance through the late morning haze we could see the low Cuddapah hills with their distinct tilted strata.   

The train crossed the Eparchean Unconformity and entered the Proterozoic through a breach in the Cuddapah hills at Dhone Junction. Ahead was the Cuddapah Basin stretching to the horizon.

We moved through quartzites, limestone, and shale, the three predominant sedimentary rock types of the shallow marine Proterozoic continental shelf. At Nandyal I had to hop onto a bus going to Kurnool. Gani village was midway between these two places. I remember arriving at Gani late evening to a warm welcome by my host Mr. Sivanand Rao. Next morning, with maps and aerial photos, hammer, and a geologic compass I started out. A half hour walk south of Gani were outcrops of the sedimentary rocks I had to map. It was a challenging and immensely satisfying introduction to field geology.

Picture shows a very youthful me and my field guide Yanganna standing in front of a quartzite hill. Captured by my accompanying batch mate Nitin Rane. June 1987.

Someday soon I hope to retrace my steps to little Gani village. The medium gauge tracks from Guntakal to Nandyal have long been replaced by standard gauge. Express trains pass through Nandyal, eventually swerving north towards Vishakapatam, or continuing south east towards the Coromandel Coast.

From Nandyal I may hire a car to Gani. I hope to meet Mr Sivanand Rao who so graciously hosted me over two field trips. I want to walk again towards the hills made of Paniam Quartzite, a sand deposit sorted and washed clean by powerful Proterozoic tides. Today, the Kurnool-Gani solar park stands near Gani, its tilted solar panels made up of ultra pure silica wafers making up an Anthropocene analogue of the more ancient quartz rich deposits.

Photomicrograph shows the Proterozoic Paniam Quartzite classified as a “super mature quartz arenite”. Notice the well rounded quartz grains outlined by iron oxide. Location - Gani anticline.

Beyond the quartzite hills are the Vempalle Formation dolomite, a vestige of the Proterozoic ocean I first waded in to begin my life long association with carbonate sedimentology. It will be a home coming of sorts for me.

Photomicrograph shows microbial layers in the Vempalle dolomite. Dolomite crystals of different size and shape have replaced the original organic mats. Location- Gani anticline.

I have one more incentive to relive this journey. The filter coffee at Guntakal railway station canteen. It is the very best.

Oldest Himalaya Rocks

In Peninsular India, the most significant change in rock type occur across what is known as the Archean Proterozoic boundary.

Archean rocks, older than 2.5 billion years, are typically varieties of granite and granite gneiss. They formed when the earth was much hotter and silica rich continental crust was growing by injections of magma from the uppermost mantle and by partial melting of older mafic (silica poor) crust. At places the crust subsided by vertical movements, and lava and sediment filled the narrow depressions. These volcano-sedimentary rocks were deformed and metamorphosed to form linear schist enclaves within the granitic crust. The term granite greenstone terrain describes this rock association.

This phase of continental crust building petered out by around 2. 5 billion years ago. The thick crustal blocks or cratons became the nuclei for future continent growth. By 2 billion years ago or so in the Paleoproterozoic (the Proterozoic Eon spans from 2.5 billion years ago to 538 million years ago) , the Archean crust became the floor for several sedimentary basins. Erosion of the Archean rocks provided sediments that accumulated in these basins over the next 1 billion years, with long hiatuses punctuating pulses of sediment deposition. The names of these sites of deposition will be familiar to many readers and travelers.  Aravallis, Vindhyans, and Cuddapah, to name a few, represent this younger Proterozoic phase of crustal recycling. 

There was limited development in Peninsular India of younger sedimentary basins and as a result Archean and Proterozoic crustal sections are widely exposed all across the country.

The satellite imagery posted below shows one classic locality of the Archean Proterozoic boundary. This is from the Cuddapah Basin of South India.  

The Archean granitic terrain has a rough texture due to the bouldery nature of the landscape formed by weathering of fractured granite. Towards the east north east, the layering of sedimentary strata of the Cuddapah Basin is prominent and unmistakable.  The following graphic is a geologic log prepared to describe the succession of rock types from the Cuddapah Basin.

Source: Vivek S Kale and coworkers; Proc. Indian. Nat. Sci. Academy 2020.

Archean 'basement' and Proterozoic 'cover sequence' is a common stratigraphic motif of the Precambrian geology of India.

A few weeks ago I found an old paper from the 1970's on the sedimentology and stratigraphy of Tethyan sequences from the Kali valley area, near the Kumaon Nepal border. These are, as the name suggests, sediments deposited in the Tethyan Ocean along the  northern margin of the Indian continent. They range in age from the Proterozoic to the Mesozoic.

Here is the stratigraphic column from the paper. I have shown only the Precambrian (Archean and Proterozoic collectively make up the Precambrian) section of the column. The Central Crystallines are assigned an Archean age, while the Tethyan Sequence Martoli Formation is Early Precambrian. The name Proterozoic was not in use in the 1970's when this paper was written.

 Source: S. Kumar and coworkers; Journal of Paleontological Society of India 1977.

'Crystalline' in this context refers to the rock texture made up of large interlocking minerals formed during slow cooling of a magma or during high temperature metamorphism of a sedimentary rock.

The geologic sequence I described earlier took place along the northern margin of India too where the future Himalaya would form. At first glance the Himalaya sequence seems a replica of the geology of Precambrian Peninsular India. It records an Archean  'crystalline'  basement, succeeded by variably deformed and metamorphosed Precambrian (Proterozoic) sediments.

Except that it is wrong. There are no Archean age rocks exposed anywhere in the Himalaya. And the rock units immediately in contact with the Archean are not Early Precambrian.

When this paper was published there was precious little geochronology work done in the Himalaya. Geologists knew from sporadic absolute dating of Peninsular rocks that the granite and granite gneiss terrains are older than 2.5 billion years  (Archean).  The thick sedimentary sequences overlying the granite basement also were Precambrian as ascertained by dating intrusive granites and interbedded lava layers. The lack of any shelly fossils in them was another indicator of the Precambrian age of the cover sedimentary sequences. 

Given this familiarity with Peninsular geology, it would have been natural to assign the same chronology to a Himalaya rock sequence of high grade gneiss in contact with unfossiliferous sedimentary rocks. 

The Central Crystallines are now known as the Greater Himalaya Sequence and they are not Archean but Neoproterozoic (Late Precambrian) in age. Detailed work has shown that they represent sediments deposited roughly between 1 billion and 600 million years ago along the northern continental shelf of India. A paleogeographic reconstruction of the Himachal Himalaya by Alexander Webb and coworkers shows the original disposition of the different Himalaya rock divisions. Observe (A) that the Greater Himalaya (GHC) and the lower part of the Tethyan Himalaya (Haimanta/Martoli Formation) were deposited synchronously in adjacent areas of the continental shelf.  

 Source: Alexander Webb and coworkers; Geosphere 2011.

They look very different from each other today because they experienced different conditions during Himalaya mountain building. The Central Crystallines which began their life as marine sediments became crystalline gneisses and schists during high grade Cenozoic metamorphism 35 to 20 million years ago, while the Tethyan Sequence escaped being buried deep in the crust and retained much of their original sedimentary character. 

What about the oldest Himalaya rocks? These are Paleoproterozoic in age, dated to be about 1.9 to 1. 8 billion years old. The units Damtha, Berinag, Wangtu, Jeori and Baragaon in the Himachal Himalaya cross section are the Paleoproterozoic age rocks. They are remnants of a magmatic arc and associated basins which formed along the northern margin of India when continental blocks were colliding and suturing into an early supercontinent named Colombia.

Underneath these Paleoproterozoic rocks would have been the Archean 'basement'. But where is it now? 

We can take a step back and understand how the Himalaya are constructed. As the Indian continental crust collided and pressed into Asia, a crack or a fault initiated in the collision zone started propagating southwards, slowly splitting the Indian crust.  As India kept getting pushed under Asia along this master fault, slices of Indian crust get scraped off  and thrust upwards along subsidiary faults to form a growing mountain range. This tectonic evolution is depicted as stages B, C, D, E, F. You can also read my post Himalaya: A Critical Wedge for more details on the mechanisms of mountain building.

If as shown in the cross section, the faults that break and transport crustal sheets are located entirely within the Proterozoic and younger layers then the Archean rocks won't get incorporated into the Himalayan orogen. They lie below the basal detachment/master fault. Alternatively, this model may not be applicable everywhere in the Himalaya and there may be slivers of Archean rocks buried deep under the thrust pile, but erosion hasn't exposed them yet. 

In the geologic future, the plate tectonic engine that made the Himalaya will change track. The mountain ranges will stop growing. Erosion will wear down the Himalaya and eventually lay bare its roots. The Archean 'crystalline basement' so familiar all over Peninsular India will also be visible at the base of the gentle rolling hills that were once the mighty Himalaya.

Remotely India: Bundelkhand Mafic Dikes and Quartz Veins

Remotely India #14

Do you see anything striking (pun intended) about this geologic map of the Bundelkhand craton?

Source: Sarada Mohanty 2023- Proterozoic Basins of the Bundelkhand Craton

Notice that the green lines are predominantly oriented in a NW-SE direction. The pink lines are predominantly striking NE-SW. These are magmatic and fluid intrusions into the Bundelkhand granitic crust. The green lines represent mafic dikes (Mg and Fe rich basaltic magma), and the pink lines represent quartz veins. 

The Bundelkhand craton is an Archean age block of continental crust. Like other Archean age terrains, it has a long history of magmatism, volcanism, and sedimentation. The oldest rocks, a suite of granitic rocks going by the term 'tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite', and associated volcanics and chemical sediments are as old as 3.4 billion years. Through the Archean the crust grew by repeated injections of magma. Voluminous magmatism petered out by around 2. 4 billion years ago with the formation of the Bundelkhand granodiorite batholith, an enormous subsurface body of congealed magma. Granodiorite is a calcium feldspar bearing variant of granite. This younger rock type covers most of the surface area of this terrain.

Geologic activity continued for hundred of millions of years after the emplacement of this batholith with the intrusion of these impressive dike swarms and quartz vein clusters.

Staying true to the objective of this series on Indian geology as seen from satellite imagery, the emphasis here will be on the field features of these intrusive bodies.

Giant Quartz Veins:

Locality- Northeast of Mauranipur, Uttar Pradesh.

The quartz vein stands out as a high long ridge. Steep sided blocks of quartz make up the spine of the ridge. Weathered boulders shed from the quartz vein have formed the surrounding slopes. This distinctive landform is instantly recognizable in the imagery as you explore this region.  

Locality: Southeast of Mohangarh, Madhya Pradesh.

Here you can observe the intrusive relationship between the giant quartz vein and the older Bundelkhand granite (BG) which crops up as low hills made up of a light toned fractured rock. The linear vein can be traced cutting across the host rock.

Locality: Southeast of Mauranipur, Uttar Pradesh.

At this location you can observe an unusual feature. Two quartz veins have split to form a tuning fork shaped geomorphic feature.

These quartz veins intruded the crust around 2.15 to 2 billion years ago. The quartz crystals contain bubbles of gas and minuscule amounts of liquid trapped inside them. They inform us about the temperature and pressure during precipitation of the crystals and about the salinity of the fluid. There are also tiny crystals of other hydrous minerals like chlorite and epidote found inside the quartz. These reveal the source of the fluid. Such studies conducted by Duttanjali Rout and colleagues identify two distinct sources of fluids involved in the formation of these veins. A hot moderate salinity fluid derived from the Bundelkhand granodiorite mixed with meteoric water percolation downwards through fractures. The deeper fluids were sourced from not more than 5 km in the subsurface.

A drop in the temperature and pressure of the rising silica saturated fluid as it encountered the colder meteoric water resulted in decrease of silica solubility and the precipitation of quartz. The giant quartz veins are the product of a vigorous Proterozoic geothermal system that lasted tens of millions of years. The researchers have drawn a comparison with Broadlands-Ohaaki geothermal system in Northland, New Zealand, and the Kakkonda geothermal system in NE Japan. Both are in granitic terrains and could be loose analogs for the processes in operation during the formation of the Bundelkhand quartz veins.  

There are differences in what we can observe in these ancient and modern systems. In the Proterozoic example, the surface expression of the silica rich geothermal system, the hot springs and geysers, have long since eroded away. We can study only the subsurface plumbing system. In the modern settings, the surface processes are apparent and the underground patterns of fluid flow have to be inferred. 

Mafic Dikes:

Locality- Northeast of Lalitput, Uttar Pradesh,

A NNW-SSE trending dike is exposed near Tera village. The surface expression of mafic dikes is very different from the quartz veins. The dikes weather away faster and are exposed as low relief hills with extensive boulder fields derived from the weathering of the dolerite rock. In the satellite imagery, you can see the dark toned nature of the boulders hinting at its mafic composition. Due to the spread of boulders around the dike, the width of the intrusion appears far more that its true width. 

Locality- Mahoba , Uttar Pradesh

An ENE-WSW trending mafic dike is surrounded by Mahoba town. As with the NW-SE trending cluster, these E-W trending intrusions also appear as dark toned low relief boulder strewn hills.

Locality- Mahoba, Uttar Pradesh.

This is a synoptic view of the E-W trending dike, captured by ISRO Cartosat. The white rectangle in the lower left of the image is the bounding area covered by the previous imagery. It is quite an extensive intrusion, and to the eastern end it can be seen cutting across outcrops of the Bundelkhand granite. 

Geochronologic work on these mafic dikes shows that the NW-SE trending dike swarm intruded around 1.9 to 1.8 billion years ago. The E-W trending group of dikes are much younger, dated to about 1.1 billion years ago. 

The geochemistry of these dikes point to an upper mantle source of the magma. The dikes are a variety of thoeliitic basalt, not too much different from the basalts of the Deccan Traps in Maharashtra. Unlike the shallow sourced fluid of the quartz veins, the source magma of the dikes was generated at least 50 km down in the mantle lithosphere.

The crisscrossing lines you see on a geologic map of the Bundelkhand craton are a record of geologic activity that continued long after voluminous granitic magmatism ended. In rare exposures, mafic dikes are seen cutting across quartz veins, indicating that they are the younger of the intrusives. Most of the geochronology data collected so far supports this field observation. Studies of the spatial patterns of the dikes and quartz veins too hint that they represent two independent deformation events. The formation of both these systems required extensive fracturing and faulting  of the crust by extensional forces. Geologists are still working out the reasons for these crustal disturbances. 

In the case of the quartz veins, the fracture systems tapped relatively shallow sources of heat and fluids. In the subsequent reactivation of the crust, much deeper fracture systems cutting across the crust tapped upper mantle sources of heat,  providing conduits for the passage of mafic magma to shallower crustal levels. 

These deep crust penetrating fractures and Proterozoic mafic dike swarms tell another story about the strength of the crust and the advent of plate tectonics, but that is fuel for another post!

I am having fun resurrecting my Remotely India series. Stay in touch for more explorations of Indian geology on this blog.

Links: Long Covid, Galapagos Islands, Origin Of Life

 I enjoyed reading these over the past few days.

1) Clues to Long Covid:  The disease that has affected us over two long years is still quite a mystery. Jennifer Couzin-Frankel has written a very informative article on the quest to understand Long Covid and how to treat it. 

2) The Galapagos Is a Glimpse of Eternity.  Geology influence organismal habitat and life habits. Penguins nesting in lava tubes. Tortoises finding warm volcanic vents to raise their body temperatures. Paul Stewart describes the landscapes of the Galapagos Islands with its amazing biodiversity, now threatened by climate change. 

3) From Pre Biotic Soup To Fine Grained RNA World. I often come across new articles breathlessly announcing that organic molecules of various types have been found on asteroids. But whatever the source of different molecules, it is specific conditions on early earth that we need to understand to arrive at a sensible theory of the origin of life. Fine article by Philip Ball.

Field Photos: Dikes And Gneiss

My friends have been traveling across India and sending me pictures of landscapes and rocks. I am doing field work vicariously.

Posting below a few pictures that I have received.

Dikes Intruding Bundelkhand Gneiss. Pictures by Rajesh Sarde.

These two photos were taken at the Ken River gorge in Madhya Pradesh, near a gharial sanctuary. 

The dark rock making up the floor of the gorge is a dike. It has intruded the pink colored gneiss rock. Notice that the gneiss is fractured. Intrusions follow major weak zones in the gneiss.  Being softer than the gneiss, erosion over time has removed much of the dike, forming a narrow valley.

And in this picture, an arm of the dike known as an apophysis can been seen. It is almost at right angles to the gorge.

The Bundelkhand Gneiss ranges in age between 3.2 billion to about 2.5 billion years ago. The mafic dikes, igneous rocks rich in iron and magnesium silicate minerals, intruded later into the granite gneiss. Recent geochronological work on the dikes suggest two distinct events of dike emplacement, an early episode dated to about 2 billion years ago, and a later one at 1.1 billion years ago. Interestingly, the magnetic signatures frozen in these dikes have been used to make inferences about paleogeography. The results indicate that the north and south Indian crustal blocks which had independent origins were in close proximity by about 2.5 billion years ago. 

The magnetic signatures of the 1.1 billion year old dikes throw up a puzzle. They match those preserved in the Upper Vindhyan strata and intrusive rocks, seemingly constraining the age of the Upper Vindhyan sequence to around 1 billion years. However, recent fossil finds which I wrote about in a recent article for Nature India point to the Upper Vindhyans being much younger, about 550 million years old!

Dikes Intruding the Deccan Traps. Pictures by Rajesh Sarde.

These two photos were taken at the base of Tamhini Ghat, west of Pune, near a popular trekking spot known as Plus Valley. The rocks are about 66-65 million years old.

As in the previous example, the dike has eroded away faster than the host rock forming a narrow depression. Notice the closely spaced jointing pattern or cracks in the dike. 

 In this photo, the sharp boundary between the dike and the basalt rock can be clearly seen.

 Tonalite Trondhjemite Gneiss, Palolem Beach, Goa. Picture by Aneeha. 

These rocks, abbreviated as TTG, are relicts of early continental crust. They are about 3.4-3.2 billion years old. They represent Archaean age magmatism that formed the lighter continental crust. Such TTG's  are found all across India. They are the oldest component of cratons, the nucleus of the first continents. These magmas are generally granodiorites, rich in sodium and calcium feldspars and poor in potassium feldspars. They were deformed and metamorphosed subsequently in to a gneiss, in the process acquiring a characteristic banding. 

Next time hopefully pictures from my own field trips!

Cyanobacteria And Mountain Building In The Paleoproterozoic

By 2.3 billion years ago, cyanobacteria employing oxygenic photosynthesis began proliferating in the world's oceans. This resulted, several hundreds of millions of years later, in triggering the formation of fold mountain belts in places where tectonic plates converge and collide. 

This big idea linking geological processes and biological evolution is explored in an interesting paper by John Parnell and Conner Brolly published in Communications Earth and Environment.  

Source: Examining the tectono-stratigraphic architecture, structural geometry, and kinematic evolution of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt, Kumaun, northwest India- S Mandal et.al. 2019.

Consider how fold mountain grow using this example from the Lesser Himalaya. The different colored layers are rocks formed on the northern margin of the Indian plate. They range from 1.8 billion years to around 50 million years in age. As the Indian continent collided with Asia around 50 million years ago, this pile of metamorphic and sedimentary rocks was squeezed by compressional forces. They were folded and broken up by thrust faults into a series of panels or sheets. Deformation of the Indian plate spread from north to south. As you gaze from the top to the bottom of the graphic you will notice that folding and faulting first began at the zone of collision (extreme right of the graphic). Over time the locus of deformation migrated further and further away from the site of continental contact. New faults grew and moved sheets of rocks southwards, stacking them and building mountains by thickening the crust.

Now look at the more detailed cross section below from Mandal's paper. The fold and thrust architecture of Lesser Himalaya is clearly revealed. The thin pink lines are the thrust faults and they have partitioned the rock pile into a series of panels (A-G), causing 'stratigraphic repetition' across the mountain belt. Internally, each panel has the same sequence of layers. I am ignoring some of the complexities of the formation of the Greater Himalaya for the sake of brevity.

Parnell and Brolly argue that the increased biomass in oceans starting 2.3 billion years ago produced organic rich sediment, which transformed on burial into carbonaceous shale and graphite bearing metamorphic rocks. The rates at which tectonic plates move meant that basins that filled up with such sediments began arriving at collisional zones some 200 million years since their initiation. 

Carbon rich and graphite bearing layers reduce friction along faults making the contractional deformation I outlined in the Himalaya example easier. The widespread mountain building activity observed in the geological record from 2 to 1. 8 billion years ago was helped along by faults preferentially splitting the rock pile along weaker graphite rich layers with the carbonaceous material acting as a lubricant, allowing easier movement and stacking of the faulted blocks. The nice graphic below compiles instances of mountain building that took place during that time frame from across the globe.  

Source: Increased biomass and carbon burial 2 billion years ago triggered mountain building- Parnell and Brolly 2021.

The authors give several examples of Paleoproterozoic orogenic belts in which major fault zones are associated with graphite rich layers. They also point out that the atomic arrangement of carbon in graphite that has been disturbed by faulting is different from the background graphite in sediment. Many fault zones in their examples contain this 'disordered' graphite bolstering their case that graphite was mobilized during fault movement.

This connection between carbon rich sediment and faulting appears as a recurring theme in geologic history. Another example comes from the Cretaceous when there was abundant deposition of organic rich sediment during times of globally high sea levels and oxygen depleted ocean depths. The resulting black shales subsequently provided the weak zones for faults to split and move crustal sheets during the building of the Rockies, the Andes and other mountain ranges spread widely across continents.

While it makes sense that carbonaceous material will reduce frictional resistance and enhance fault movement, one must be careful not to overemphasize the causal link between carbon rich sediment and mountain building. After building a case for the close association of carbonaceous sediments and major faults, the authors write, "Given the link between organic matter and deformation evident in younger rocks, the scene was set for collisional orogenesis at ~2 Ga (Fig. 1) by the exceptional accumulation of organic carbon during the mid-Palaeoproterozoic.

I would think that 'the scene was set for collisional orogenesis at ~2 Ga' not because of the presence of carbon rich sediment, but because by that time a global plate tectonic regime was operating and plate forces were maneuvering continents in directions that resulted in them converging at multiple places. The pulse of mountain building during that time period occurred because several continents crashed into each other. 

That the presence of carbonaceous sediment may aid faulting but is not a necessary condition for thrust fault regimes to develop in convergent settings is supported by looking at what occurred earlier in geologic history before the exceptional bloom in cyanobacterial growth and carbon burial. Yatin Zong and colleagues in a recent paper published in Nature Communications describe the formation of the Central Orogenic Belt of Northern China which formed by the collision of a chain of oceanic volcanoes with the North China continent in Neoarchean times (2.8-2.5 billion years ago). They demonstrate the development of fold and thrust structures and large distance movement along thrust faults that occurred in this convergent plate setting along the North China continental margin between 2.6 and 2.5 billion years ago. Here, thrust faulting detached sheets of the crust made up of lava erupted from oceanic volcanoes and also sediments deposited in adjacent basins and moved them hundreds of kilometers.  The fault surface was lubricated by copious amounts of the shiny mineral mica. 

This is several hundred million years before the exceptional accumulation of carbonaceous sediment in Paleoproterozoic times. It appears that the lithosphere deforms in a mechanically consistent style under the horizontal compressive forces prevalent in plate tectonic settings, with hydrated oceanic crust, water saturated clays, micas, and carbon being alternative candidates for reducing friction.

How did the outer shell of the earth behave before plate tectonics? Early earth was a much hotter place. Warm rocks are weak. Plate motion is driven by a pull force that is imparted as a tectonic plate subducts or sinks underneath another tectonic plate. So, for plate tectonics to evolve, the lithosphere or the outer shell of the earth has to become strong enough not to disintegrate as it is being pulled by its subducting leading edge. Such conditions, geologists think, likely became more and more common as the earth cooled sufficiently by about 3 billion years ago. 

Before this time tectonics played out as gravity driven vertical movements of the crust . This inference is based on the structures observed in many Archean age terrains which show large granitic bodies encircled by steeply tilted and metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary rocks. On a hotter earth, buoyant granitic magmas rose and intruded the near-surface volcanic and sedimentary layers pushing them aside and thermally transforming them into low grade metamorphic rocks.

This ensemble of metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary rocks are called greenstones. The typical structure is a granitic dome encircled by vertically oriented layers of greenstone having a flattened or schistose fabric formed due to the parallel orientation of platy minerals like micas and chlorite. The satellite image below shows one of the classic examples of this 'dome and keel' structure from the Archean age terrain of Pilbara from northwest Australia. Grey green narrow schist belts are wedged between light colored oblate shaped granitic domes.  The Pilbara terrain ranges in age from 3. 5 billion to 2. 9 billion years.

The Indian continental crust has its share of these Archean granite-greenstone associations. Some prominent ones are in Karnataka, exposed near Dharwar, Shimoga and Kolar. Most of these belts are older than 3 billion years in age.

Contrast this structural style with that of a classic fold belt from younger Proterozoic times. These are the famous Nallamala ranges in south India formed by horizontal compressive forces.

The earth changed considerably between 3 and 2 billion years ago. Chemical differentiation of magmas separated heavier elements from the lighter ones, forming continents made up of lighter buoyant granitic rocks and oceanic depressions floored by denser basalt lava. The growing mechanical strength of its outer shell formed coherent slabs or plates ultimately resulting in the more familiar plate tectonic cycles of super-continent formation and breakups. 

Another striking change appeared on the surface by 2 billion years; the formation of high topography. In the Archean, growth of new crust by constant injections of magma kept the outer shell warm and weak, unable to support the weight of tall mountains.  As the earth cooled the lithosphere gained strength and became rigid. High mountains built by tectonic thickening of the crust at continent collision zones could now stand on a strong foundation.

Folds, faults, crushed rocks, and mountain belts. All these dramatic contortions of the crust readily invite us to probe the physical evolution of the lithosphere as an explanation for the geological dynamism of our planet. Parnell and Brolly in their paper remind us that unique biological events have played a role too in shaping earth's physical features, even those as immense as the Himalaya.  

*******************

Wishing readers a very Happy and Safe New Year!

Links: Birth Of Species, Children's Book, Rise Of Oxygen

 Some geology and evolution material for your perusal.

1) I came across this well crafted documentary by Niles Eldredge and Stefano Dominici on the history of the development of ideas on the birth of species. It is a paleontologist's perspective with fossils being given the centre stage. A great many personalities who contributed to the early thinking on the origin of species are featured. Among the prominent ones who influenced Darwin were Lamarck, Cuvier, Giambattista Brocchi, and John Herschel to name a few. Completely left out of this film is Alfred Wallace. 

It does center around Darwin, and, later towards the end, on Niles Eldredge's work on Punctuated Equilibrium, which he published in collaboration with Stephen Jay Gould. I have often wondered whether there was any tension between Eldredge and Gould regarding proprietorship over Punctuated Equilibrium given Gould's very bombastic advocacy of this idea. The last section of this film is revealing! 

Beautifully compiled. Do watch. 

 

If  you are unable to access the embedded video, view it at this permanent link - The Birth of Species. 

2) Zircon (zirconium silicate) is a remarkable mineral. Born in the cauldron of magma chambers, it is henceforth virtually indestructible unless it is melted down again. This makes it a witness to geological processes affecting and shaping terrains over hundreds of millions of  years. What a story it has to tell us. And that is precisely what geochronologist Matthew Fox has done. He has written a children's book titled Jane's Geological Adventure, which follows Jane, the zircon grain, from her birth in a magma chamber to a life lasting 400 million years. Alka Tripathy-Lang reviews the book.

Meet Jane, the Zircon Grain—Geochronology’s New Mascot.

3) Elizabeth Pennisi writes about a new paper published in Nature Geosciences on the link between the increase in the length of the day and the rise of atmospheric oxygen on early earth. 

‘Totally new’ idea suggests longer days on early Earth set stage for complex life.

Readings: Erectus SE Asia, Devonian Fossil Forest, Archean Iron Formations

Some selected readings:

1) New dates of Homo erectus from Ngandong Java shows late surviving populations until 117,000 to 108,000 years ago. A short clean summary by Razib Khan on SE Asian hominin diversity.

Southeast Asia during the Eemian was a hominin paradise.

Paper: Last appearance of Homo erectus at Ngandong, Java, 117,000–108,000 years ago.

2) Exquisite preservation of one of the earliest forests from the Mid Devonian ( ~385 million years ago) of New York containing a modern looking root system.

Paper - Mid-Devonian Archaeopteris Roots Signal Revolutionary Change in Earliest Fossil Forests.

Write up : The World’s Oldest Forest Has 385-Million-Year-Old Tree Roots.

3) Before around 2.3 billion years ago there was very little oxygen in the atmosphere. This was a time before the evolutionary invention of oxygenic photosynthesis wherein bacteria harvest electrons from H2O and release oxygen as a byproduct. Instead, during this time another photosynthesis pathway known as photoferrotrophy was prevalent. Here, bacteria use light and ferrous iron (Fe+2) to fix CO2 as biomass, releasing ferric iron (Fe+3) as byproduct. This ferric iron then accumulated to form large iron deposits. But these deposits lack organic matter. How to explain this if the iron was being produced from a biomass? Scientists point to a role of silica. At that time the oceans were saturated in free silica. Experimental work shows that in the presence of free silica cell surfaces repel iron hydroxides, thus creating a source of organic matter free iron deposits. This organic matter then was acted upon by methane producing microbes. The methane released kept the temperature of the earth warmer than it would have been under a dim early sun.

Fascinating story of the feedback between geology and evolution.

Photoferrotrophy, deposition of banded iron formations, and methane production in Archean oceans.

Dharwar Craton- Gooty Fort

I had quite a fruitful interaction today on Twitter, after I replied to a tweet about the location of Gooty Fort in Andhra Pradesh.

The fort is built on Archaean gneiss terrain just to the west of the Cuddapah sedimentary basin. I'm embedding the tweet below. It invoked quite a few questions about the terrain and the geology of that region.

Great geological location too- Built on the Archean Dharwar craton (granite/gneiss), just west of the Proterozoic Cuddapah sedimentary basin... pic.twitter.com/VAijypulQF

— Suvrat Kher (@rapiduplift) May 14, 2018

And here is the link to the full discussion thread on Twitter - Gooty Fort, Andhra Pradesh

How Old Are The Aravalli Mountains Of Rajasthan?

By the age of a mountain range I mean the time since the formation of significant topography. I don't mean the age of rocks making up the mountains. There are plenty of instances where terrains made up of rocks of a particular age have been rejuvenated and uplifted by earth movements later in time. The most spectacular example in India are the Himalaya. The oldest rocks in the Himalaya are dated to about 1.8 billion years. These, along with rocks ranging in age from more than a billion years to about 50 million years, have up thrust up during mountain building that began about 25 million years ago.

There are other less well known examples from India. The Bababudan hills in Karnataka are made up of rocks as old as 3.5 billion years. The topography though is much younger. This area is a southern extension of the Deccan plateau which has been rejuvenated during the Cenozoic. Another example are the massifs of the Nilgiri Hills in the Western Ghats. These massifs reach about 7500 feet ASL. They are made up of charnockite, a high grade metamorphic rock. This terrain was metamorphosed about 2.5 billion years ago and then again around 550 million years ago. It too has been uplifted in the more recent Cenozoic.

So, how old are the Aravalli mountains?

In a recent article in LiveMint on the ecology, geology and archaeological significance of the Aravalli mountains of Rajasthan, Ananda Banerjee writes-

"These ancient rocks are part of the oldest mountain range in the world—the Aravalli range, or “The Ridge”, as it has been more commonly known in Delhi from the days of British rule".

He quotes author Pranay Lal " “It took two billion years (from a point in time between 3.2 billion years to 1.2 billion years ago) of shoving and pushing of tectonic plates and magma outpourings to create these ancient fold mountains”

This statement does not really inform us about the sequence of geological events that took place. Did the Aravalli  mountain building really take two billion years? Was it really initiated 3.2 billion years ago?

The Aravalli fold mountains are made up of layers of sediments interlayered with volcanic rocks. The deposition of these volcano-sedimentary successions took place on the sea floor. This entire pile has been subdivided into the Aravalli Super Group and the Delhi Super Group corresponding to two distinct cycles of sedimentation and orogeny.

The satellite image below shows the folded ridges of the Aravalli mountains west of the city of Udaipur

The geologic story begins, as Lal pointed out, about 3.3. to 3.2 billion years ago (1). At this time prolific 'granitic' magmatism was creating new crust. These magmas go under the name TTG, for tonalites, trondhjemites, and granodiorites. Sediments and interlayered basalt volcanic layers were deposited in contemporaneous basins. Geologists think that the tectonic setting for TTG magmatism would have been similar to a convergent plate margin, where one plate subducts or slides underneath another plate. The setting for volcanic-sedimentary deposits may have been a rifted oceanic basin.

The schematic below shows the evolution of cratons during the Archaean. Early continental nuclei were separated by oceanic basins.

Source: P.A. Cawood, C.J. Hawkesworth, and B. Dhuime - The continental record and the generation of continental crust

 These different terrains slowly sutured and welded together to form larger continental fragments. In this process the TTG  and the volcano-sedimentary deposits got metamorphosed and deformed. The result was a complicated terrain with slices of granite gneiss (metamorphosed TTG) interleaved with low to medium grade metamorphic rocks like chlorite and amphibolite schists (metamorphosed  basalt and other volcanic rocks and sediments).

The cross section below summarizes the complicated structure of the granite-greenstone belts of Rajasthan.

D.B. Guha 2008 - Tectonostratigraphy and Crustal Evolution of the Archaean Greenstone-Granulite Belt of Rajasthan

This granite-greenstone terrain (due to the presence of green colored minerals like chlorite and amphiboles) is called the Banded Gneiss Complex. It is made up of two sub terrains named the Sandamata Complex and the Mangalwar Complex. The formation of the Banded Gneiss Complex was completed by about 2.5 billion years ago when profuse granitic magmatism ended. Geologists call this craton stabilization. Initially, this terrain may have had topography. Hill ranges may have stood out in this area about 2.5 billion years ago. However, this was followed by a long period of erosion wherein the terrain was peneplained. Evidence for deep weathering of this terrain comes from paleosols (soils) which mantle parts of the Banded Gneiss Complex.

This was followed by the sagging of the granite-greenstone crust and the formation of new sedimentary basins.

The Banded Gneiss Complex forms the basement on which the Aravalli Supergroup sediments were deposited. These older rocks therefore were the sea floor at that time. No fold mountain ranges existed in this region around 2 billion years ago.

Galena (Lead Sulphide) which occurs in volcanic rocks interlayered in the lower part of the Aravalli Super Group has been dated to about 2 billion years. This is taken as roughly the start of Aravalli sedimentation. This basin lasted for about 200 million years. Granites intruding the Aravalli Supergroup have been dated to about 1. 85 billion years. These are syn-orogenic granites which form when continental fragments collide, and the deeply buried crust partially melts to generate granitic magma. Geologists think that the tectonic event responsible for this was the collision of the Aravalli craton and the Bundelkhand craton. The Aravalli orogeny and fold belt formation is thus about 1. 8 billion years old.

At this time there would have been a fold mountain range made up of crumpled up Aravalli Supergroup rocks. Subsequently, beginning around 1.7 billion years ago, another basin developed in the north and west of the older Aravalli basin. In this basin were deposited sediments and volcanic material that make up the Delhi Supergroup of rocks. Among these rocks are the resistant quartzites that make up the Delhi Ridge. The Delhi basin closed and the rocks folded and  uplifted by about 1 billion years ago. The tectonic event responsible for the Delhi orogeny is thought to be the collision between the Aravalli-Bundelkhand craton and the Marwar craton to the west. The contact between the two is the Western Margin Fault along which the Phulad Ophiolite rocks lay sandwiched. These are remnants of the oceanic crust that existed between the two continental blocks.

The Aravalli fold belt, made up of the Aravalli Supergroup and the Delhi Supergroup formed over an extended time period in two phases, the first one about 1.8 billion and the second about 1 billion years ago.

The map below shows the different geologic terrains of the Rajasthan craton

Source: Joseph Meert et.al. 2010 - Precambrian crustal evolution of Peninsular India: A 3.0 billion year odyssey

Does that mean we can say that the maximum age of the Aravalli mountains is about 1.8 billion years?

This is an intriguing question and it depends on what might seem a rather esoteric question. What is the nature of the contact between the Aravalli Supergroup rocks and the younger Delhi Supergroup rocks? The Aravalli and Delhi rocks have a sheared and faulted contact. This means that the two terrains have been moved along faults from their original positions and juxtaposed against each other. But some work suggests that their original relationship was different. Field relations and inferred contrasting folding histories (2, 3)  implies an angular unconformity between the two. That means that Aravalli Supergroup rocks were folded earlier and then over a time span of 100 million years or so, erosion wore down the Aravalli Supergroup fold mountains to a plain. The crust then sagged, and the Aravalli rocks along with the Banded Gneiss Complex became the basin floor upon which the Delhi Supergroup sediments were deposited.

If this scenario is true, then the Rajasthan fold mountain topography formed during the younger Delhi Supergroup orogeny, that is about 1 billion years ago. The rolling hills and the gentle stream gradients suggest that erosion has been wearing the mountains down and there have not been significant earth movements affecting this part of the crust since.

How does this compare with other ancient mountain ranges. The Barbeton Greenstone Belt, also known as the Makhaonjwa Mountains, on the border of South Africa and Swaziland are thought to be the oldest mountain range in the world. They are made up of 3.5 to 3.2 billion year old rocks. On the web there are top 10/9 lists of the oldest mountain ranges in the world, which include the Hammersley Range in Western Australia (3.4 billion)  and the Waterburg Mountains in South Africa (2.7 billion) (strangely they exclude the Aravallis!) But has the topography existed since the claimed age or has an old peneplain been rejuvenated in more recent times?

That is the billion year(s) question that must be asked when evaluating any "my oldest mountains are older than your oldest mountains" claim.

Photomicrograph: Super Mature Quartz Arenites From Proterozoic Cuddapah Basin

One of the vivid memories of my Master thesis fieldwork in South India were a series of brightly reflecting hills. In the afternoons, the bare slopes of the hills were a blinding white and you had to wear dark sun glasses to minimize the glare.

These hills were made up of the Paniam Quartzite. This sedimentary sequence is part of the Neoproterozoic Kurnool Group which represents one megacycle of deposition in the long lasting Paleoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic Cuddapah Basin.  In sedimentary petrology terminology these white and bright sediments are quartz arenites, rocks made up mostly of the mineral quartz. In fact, they were super mature quartz arenites, i.e. they were made up of more than 90% quartz. I  point counted several samples and the percentage of quartz was around the 95%-96% mark.

Here is what they look like under the microscope. Notice how rounded the quartz grains are.

The white arrows in the photomicrograph below points to quartz cement which has precipitated between the grains. These cements are called overgrowths. They maintain the same optical orientation as the substrate quartz grain and hence in cross polarized light the detrital grain and the overgrowth appears as a single crystal unit. The detrital quartz grain is outlined by iron oxide dust which helps demarcate the contact between the grain and the later cement.

Here is another example of a super mature quartz arenite. The contact between the detrital grain and cement is again marked by a coat of dust. Notice the planar crystal facets of the quartz cement (white arrow) which contrasts nicely with the rounded detrital particles.

 
The example I have presented show only one generation of quartz overgrowth cement. There are instances where two generations of quartz overgrowth cements are present. Like the detrital grain, the first generation overgrowth has a coating of iron oxide or clay and is abraded. This indicates that the quartz grains have been derived from the erosion of older silica cemented sandstones. The original source of the quartz in these older sandstones were igneous or metamorphic rocks. After being eroded from these rocks and then transported and deposited, the quartz grains were overlain by silica cement (the first generation cement) and lithified into a sandstone.

Later (perhaps tens of millions of years later), this sandstone was uplifted and eroded. Disaggregation of grains during weathering broke of quartz sand particles along with attached fragments of cement. This cement overgrowth then got abraded and rounded during transport and acquired a dust coat. In its final site of deposition it was overlain by new silica overgrowth (the second generation cement). Abhijit Basu and colleagues present an interesting example of such "second cycle" or "recycled" quartz arenites from the sedimentary sequences of the Bastar Craton from Eastern India (Image to left: source Basu et al 2013).

A careful examination of quartz arenites and generations of silica cements can reveal a lot of useful information about uplift, erosion and recycling history of the earth's crust.

Quartz arenites are not restricted to the Proterozoic. They are common in younger age Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic deposits too. They occur only sporadically in Archean age deposits. Thick sequences of quartz arenites become more common in the Proterozoic. This increase in the occurrence of quartz arenites in the Proterozoic has to do with the changing tectonics of the earth.

Among the common rock forming minerals, quartz is relatively chemically inert and is more resistant to physical breakdown during weathering and transport. In the Archean, sedimentary basins were generally linear troughs formed in front of island arcs. Due to these tectonically active conditions, the basin floor subsided quickly and detritus derived from weathering of igneous and metamorphic source rocks was deposited and buried before physical attrition and chemical dissolution could remove unstable minerals. The result was a mineralogically "immature" sandstone with the framework of the rock made  up of  quartz, feldpsars and volcanic and metamorphic rock fragments in different proportions . The sediments and associated volcanic material frequently got metamorphosed to a low grade "green mineral" assemblage of chlorite, actinolite and epidote. These deformed and metamorphosed successions embedded in Archean gneiss terrains are known as greenstone belts.

There are a few instances of quartz arenites in the Archean from terrains of the Canadian Province, the Baltic Shield in Russia and from the Bababudhan Group of the Dharwar Greenstone belt in South India. Many of these have been interpreted as a product of intense chemical weathering in Archean soils, wherein unstable pyroxenes, feldspars and meta-igneous and meta-sedimentary rock fragments were leached away, leaving behind a quartz rich residue. Sedimentary structures like cross bedding and ripple marks indicate shallow water environments of deposition where the sand was further subjected to physical attrition leaving behind a quartz rich sand deposit.

Such conditions of longer residence time and more intense chemical weathering in soil profiles and long periods of attrition and physical sorting by wave and tidal action became more common in basins of Proterozoic age. Phases of prolonged magmatism and heat loss from around 3 billion years ago to 2 billion years ago resulted in a cooler earth and one that now was made up of large rafts of granite/granodiorite crust which was buoyant and tectonically stable. Although the boundary between the Archean and the Proterozoic is pegged at around 2.5 billion  years ago, basin tectonic styles do not change abruptly. These were evolving conditions.

In Peninsular India, Proterozoic age sediments were deposited in two types of basins manifesting different tectonic styles. "Mobile Belts" are reminiscent of the older Archean greenstone belts in that they were tectonically active elements of the crust, perhaps forming in subducting settings at the boundary between two cratonic blocks. They are depressions which contain abundant volcano-sedimentary successions made up of volcanic flow and ash beds interlayered with  immature sand and mud and chemically precipitated silica and iron oxide layers.  These are interpreted as deeper water deposits. Some basins contain stromatolite limestone/dolomite. There are a few quartzite deposits too.  These may be the metamorphosed equivalents of quartz arenites which were deposited in shallow water environments.  These successions were subjected to metamorphism, deformation and intrusion by granitic plutons during orogenic episodes forming the "mobile belts" or fold belts.  The Aravalli and Delhi Group of sediments which make up the Aravalli mountain ranges in Rajasthan are a good example of these Early to Mid Proterozoic mobile belts.

Overlapping in time with the mobile belts but extending into the Neoproterozoic are the epicratonic basins, also known as the "Purana" basins. These basins experienced less volcanic activity and were subjected to less deformation and metamorphism than that seen in the mobile belts. They contain thick sequences of quartz arenites and limestones.  These basins were initiated by extension and rifting of the continental crust resulting in extensive shallow marine shelf areas.  Low relief Archean to Early Proterozoic source terrains made up of granitic and metamorphic rocks were subjected to intense chemical weathering. Since the basin floor subsided slowly in these passive margin basins, shallow water conditions prevailed for long periods of time. Quartz rich residues were transported and deposited as sand sheets in beach and tidal flat settings and as sand shoals in more open waters away from the shorelines. Wave action further sorted them into a texturally mature sand.

The Paniam Quartzite, whose afternoon glare I tried in vain to avoid, is a remnant of one of these vast sand sheets that occur across many epicratonic Proterozoic basins in Peninsular India. Other examples of this stable cratonic style of deposition include the Vindhyan Basin in Central India and the Kaladgi and Bhima Basins of South India.

The satellite image below shows the brightly reflecting slopes (white arrows) of this quartz arenite deposit around the village of Gani in Andhra Pradesh. The black dotted line is the contact between the Archean basement and the overlying Proterozoic Cuddapah Basin sediments. The linear structure is the left lateral Gani Kalava fault offsetting the Cuddapah Basin.

And here is one final photomicrograph of the Paniam quartz arenite showing well rounded detrital grains with faceted quartz overgrowths meeting in planar contact in the pore spaces.

Papers- Precambrian Crustal Evolution Of Peninsular India

Over the last year or so I've collected quite a few papers on the subject of Precambrian crustal evolution and sedimentary basins of Peninsular India. I'm sharing the list with links. Many of them are available open access from various outlets.

I got my teeth cut in field geology and carbonate sedimentology during my M.S. thesis research. This involved mapping a small area of the Mesoproterozic Cuddapah basin in South India.  Peninsular India is a vast repository of these Precambrian rocks. These papers provide very interesting perspectives on various aspects of their geology. Perhaps the big leap in the past decade or so has been -finally!- the increased availability of accurate geochronology that has made it possible for geologists to start piecing together their complex polyphase history.

1) Precambrian Crustal Evolution of Peninsular India: A 3 billion year odyssey ;  Joseph G. Meert,, Manoj K. Pandit, Vimal R. Pradhan, Jonathan Banks, Robert Sirianni, Misty Stroud,Brittany Newstead, Jennifer Gifford

2) Proterozoic orogenic belts and rifting of Indian cratons: Geophysical constraints ; D.C. Mishraa, M. Ravi Kumar

3) The Archean and Proterozoic History of Peninsular India: Tectonic Framework for Precambrian Sedimentary Basins in India; Joseph G. Meert and Manoj K. Pandit

4) Precambrian Basins of India: Stratigraphic and Tectonic Context: Rajat Majumdar and Patrick G. Eriksson eds.- Collection of Paper from the Lyell Collection Geological Society of London Memoirs : Behind Paywall

5) An overview of the Palaeoproterozoic geology of Peninsular India,and key stratigraphic and tectonic issues: Dilip Saha and Rajat Mazumdar

6) Morphodiversity, complexity and macroevolution: Revealed by the megascopic life of the Palaeo-Neoproterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup, India: Poornima Srivastava

7) Stratigraphy and correlation of the Neoproterozoic deposits of central and western India: An overview: S. Kumar

8) The Central India Tectonic Zone: Geophysical perspective on continental amalgamation along a Mesoproterozoic suture:  K. Naganjaneyulu and M. Santosh

Happy reading!